"People living deeply have no fear of death."Anais Nin
|
| |
Asbestos Settlement - A Pertinent Issue
Asbestos settlement facilitates the victim of an asbestos related disease to recover compensation for his lost income, lost earning capacity, medical expenses and other psychological sufferings. Asbestos is a group of naturally occurring minerals. Its use ...
How is Mesothelioma Diagnosed?
Diagnosing mesothelioma is often difficult, because the symptoms are similar to those of a number of other conditions. Diagnosis begins with a review of the patient's medical history, including any history of asbestos exposure. A complete physical ...
The Facts about Peritoneal Mesothelioma
Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare form of mesothelioma that accounts for approximately 20% of all mesothelioma cases. Peritoneal mesothelioma affects the tissue lining the abdomen which is called the peritoneum hence the name of this form of the cancer. ...
|
|
|
| |
Mesothelioma- the Financial Costs to Society
Much has been written about asbestos related diseases such as Mesothelioma over the last couple of years. The focus has been on three main areas:
a) The unfortunate victims of mesothelioma such as former employees of asbestos mining companies who caught these diseases whilst in the course of their employment. We have seen the heart rendering images on TV of these people, all of them in their retirement years, gasping for air and suffering enormously.
b) Whether the asbestos mining companies knew that asbestos mining was a danger to human life.
c) The Multibillion dollar class actions filed by the victims against their former employers seeking compensation.
Two issues that have not been addressed are the financial costs to society of asbestos related diseases such as Mesothelioma cancer and who pays for these costs. Secondly, should asbestos mining companies be paying compensation not only to the sufferers of mesothelioma and other diseases but also to Society also?
There are two costs to society that can be identified. The first is the cost to the public health system. The second cost is the loss of tax revenue by governments due to Asbestos mining companies claiming a tax deduction for the compensation payments that are made to the victims.
In illustration of the costs to the public health system, the Asbestos Diseases Foundation of Australia has stated that by 2020 there will be 13000 cases of mesothelioma and 40000 asbestos related lung cancer diseases, totaling 53000 people and this is only in Australia! This means that 53000 people will need to have constant medical attention for the next 15 years or so. The question therefore, who pays for the cost? The answer of course is the current taxpayer and the next generation of taxpayers.
In relation to tax revenue, governments are essentially missing out on tax revenue as the asbestos companies are claiming the compensation payment as a tax deduction. For illustrative purposes, assume that an asbestos mining company pays out $100m per year over five years to the victims. Also assume that the corporate tax rate is 30 per cent. Therefore over five years, a respective government is losing $150m in revenue. Essentially it means that the asbestos mining companies are sharing the costs with the taxpayer. They pay 70 per cent of the compensation payment and the taxpayer pays the remaining balance. Most people would view this as totally inequitable.
It can be seen that the Asbestos companies are only paying a part of the costs and not the full cost. To rectify this, there are two possible solutions.
a) Respective Governments should also join class actions with Mesothelioma sufferers against the asbestos mining companies seeking compensation for medical and future medical costs. This would not be unprecedented as various State Governments of the United States sought compensation against the Tobacco Companies to pay for the medical costs of its citizens who needed medical attention because of the ill effects of smoking.
b) Governments deny a tax deduction for Mesothelioma compensation payments made by the asbestos mining companies.
Until either part a or part b happens, it is the taxpayer who will be unfairly burdened with the additional financial costs of Asbestos related diseases such as Mesothelioma.
About the author:
Author: Alex G Melan
About the Author: Website Publisher and Author
Website: http://www.mesotheliomamedic.com
Reprint Rights are Free subject to the following conditions:
a) Author's Name is published
b) An active link to http://www.mesotheliomamedic.com is also published
c) The article is published in its entirety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Asbestos cleanup begins at 1175 State St. property - New Haven Register
NEW HAVEN — Brooklyn developer State Assets LLC began asbestos cleanup at 1175 State St. Tuesday, after a multi-agency probe into allegations of unsafe working conditions there resulted in 18 violations from the U.S. Department of Labor’s ...
Chesapeake middle school evacuated after asbestos found - HamptonRoads.com
Students at Crestwood Middle School will be spending Wednesday at home after air quality tests found elevated levels of asbestos at their school Tuesday. Students were evacuated from Crestwood Tuesday afternoon, after one of six air quality tests ...
Navy defies asbestos safety laws - Age
AUSTRALIAN sailors are being exposed to deadly asbestos fibres because the navy continues to use contaminated parts, years after they were outlawed. Thousands of sailors and civilian contractors are likely to have come into contact with the ...
Asbestos suits on rise in Madison County - Telegraph
EDWARDSVILLE - The number of asbestos lawsuits filed in Madison County jumped by almost 200 cases in 2008, raising alarm among tort reform advocates, but a judge said lawyers tell him such cases are more numerous across the country. There were 639 ...
New law to help asbestos sufferers in Victoria, Australia - Mister-info.com
New legislation in Victoria, Australia will provide for greater compensation for victims suffering from effects of exposure to asbestos. The legislation is called "Bernie Banton law", after the late campaigner for asbestos-related issues. The law ...
|
